In a murder trial in Melfort, the defense argues that the ability to form intent while intoxicated is a crucial issue. However, the Crown contends that intent while drunk is still intent.
The accused, Cody Chubey, faces a charge of first-degree murder for killing his long-term partner, 30-year-old Danielle Dobersheck, in a motel room on March 10, 2024. The closing arguments were presented in Melfort Court of King’s Bench.
Chubey’s defense lawyer, Peter Abrametz, acknowledged Chubey’s responsibility for Dobersheck’s death but advocated for a conviction of manslaughter rather than murder. Chubey claimed he had no recollection of the incident due to alcohol-induced blackout when he testified.
Abrametz highlighted Chubey’s calm demeanor and lack of guilt consciousness when police arrived at the scene. The room was a gruesome sight with blood-covered walls and the snow shovel used in the assault.
The Crown prosecutor, Jennifer Souter, argued that despite Chubey’s claim of memory loss, intent can still be inferred from his actions. Souter questioned the credibility of Chubey’s testimony regarding his blackout and emphasized that intent to kill Dobersheck was evident.
Souter referenced an audio recording from the neighboring room capturing Chubey’s violent behavior towards Dobersheck. The prosecution asserted that Chubey unlawfully confined Dobersheck in the room and escalated the crime to first-degree murder.
Testimony from witnesses supported the prosecution’s claim, with details of Chubey’s controlling behavior and the violent encounter leading to Dobersheck’s death. The judge, Justice Sean Sinclair, will review the arguments before announcing the verdict on December 11.